Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Discussion about the upcoming Wasteland 3!

Moderator: Ranger Team Alpha

User avatar
Grohal
Adventurer
Posts: 782
Joined: April 26th, 2013, 9:51 pm

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby Grohal » January 10th, 2017, 4:41 am

Drool wrote:...

And how the hell did the Jerks get from Needles to LA?!


Well in MURICA Jerks are all over the place, one even became the latest president in our timeline. :mrgreen:
Hell is no place, hell is a condition.

SagaDC
Grandmaster
Posts: 3305
Joined: May 2nd, 2012, 5:51 am

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby SagaDC » January 10th, 2017, 7:03 pm

One thing that quite saddened me were all the non-human enemies that didn't make it into the game. It wasn't until I started poking through the image files that I realized just how many enemies got cut from the game.

Obviously the Giant Hermit Crabs are a pretty well-known cut enemy, since they appeared in a few of the pre-release videos. They had complete models and portraits, but for some reason they never made it into the final game.

But looking at the art files, you can also see character portraits for a lot of classic Wasteland baddies like the Boa Tronstrictor, the Cybertrike, the Hexborg, the Sniperdroid, the Warbot, the Xenon Laser Cannon, and (my personal favorite) the Vanadium Vulture. None of them made it into the game. :(

User avatar
Drool
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8384
Joined: March 17th, 2012, 9:58 pm
Location: Under Tenebrosia, doing shots with Sceadu.

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby Drool » January 10th, 2017, 8:57 pm

SagaDC wrote:But looking at the art files, you can also see character portraits for a lot of classic Wasteland baddies like the Boa Tronstrictor, the Cybertrike, the Hexborg, the Sniperdroid, the Warbot, the Xenon Laser Cannon, and (my personal favorite) the Vanadium Vulture. None of them made it into the game. :(

Would have been nice. Especially since all of those were tougher than the freaking Slicerdicers.
Alwa nasci korliri das.

I neither work, nor speak, for inXile.

Not too late; make it eight!

User avatar
Caerdon
Scholar
Posts: 192
Joined: April 5th, 2013, 5:31 pm

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby Caerdon » February 18th, 2017, 9:54 pm

One of my biggest peeves in WL2 was the camera and the constant need to fiddle with it. Personally I don't feel that an adjustable camera angle adds anything positive to a game like this, it's just extra busywork. I'd much prefer a static camera angle and areas that are designed to work well with that.

As a separate issue from above, I hate the wide camera lens and exaggerated perspective that most games like these tend to have, where everything in the bottom of the screen is enormous and everything in the top is tiny. I'd much rather have a camera that's higher in the sky but with a narrower lens, giving a more isometric feel. And there's really no reason why we can't adjust this ourselves in the options menu.

Combat initiation needs a fix. This is supposed to be a tactical game, so it's complete nonsense that we can't preposition our troops before battle. I'm sure there are many ways to fix this, but here's one: When combat begins, there's first a single round where every character can move only with ~50% action points, and after that the actual shooting begins. If the player party initiates an ambush, only they get to move. If player party is being ambushed, enemies get to move with ~50% AP and player characters get to move with ~30% AP during the prepositioning round.

Jozape
Scholar
Posts: 174
Joined: March 5th, 2012, 1:50 pm
Location: USA

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby Jozape » February 19th, 2017, 2:11 am

I thought Wasteland 3 will have 2D backgrounds, and that usually excludes rotatable cameras. Am I wrong?

If not, the camera really needs some work. Divinity: Original Sin, from what I've played of the introductory dungeon, has a much better camera. I really like how they make objects gradually transparent. More importantly if you reach the edge of the floating area, the camera simply moves up and points down rather than moving up and zooming out like in Wasteland 2 if you float into very high hills.

crimsoncorporation
Initiate
Posts: 18
Joined: January 26th, 2017, 3:50 pm

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby crimsoncorporation » February 19th, 2017, 2:27 am

Caerdon wrote:Combat initiation needs a fix. This is supposed to be a tactical game, so it's complete nonsense that we can't preposition our troops before battle.


You can preposition your troops in Wasteland 2, because you can move each Ranger separately. Position to your liking, initiate your first shot, and there you go.

User avatar
Zombra
Global Moderator
Posts: 5438
Joined: March 8th, 2012, 10:50 pm

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby Zombra » February 19th, 2017, 2:52 am

crimsoncorporation wrote:
Caerdon wrote:Combat initiation needs a fix. This is supposed to be a tactical game, so it's complete nonsense that we can't preposition our troops before battle.

You can preposition your troops in Wasteland 2, because you can move each Ranger separately. Position to your liking, initiate your first shot, and there you go.

Ehhhhhhhhhh.
Support multiple squads for single-player in Wasteland 3!
Image
"I don't care about the mass market." Brian Fargo, May 2012
"We want to sell the most units." Brian Fargo, January 2017

User avatar
Grohal
Adventurer
Posts: 782
Joined: April 26th, 2013, 9:51 pm

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby Grohal » February 19th, 2017, 4:49 am

Caerdon wrote:One of my biggest peeves in WL2 was the camera and the constant need to fiddle with it. Personally I don't feel that an adjustable camera angle adds anything positive to a game like this, it's just extra busywork. I'd much prefer a static camera angle and areas that are designed to work well with that.

As a separate issue from above, I hate the wide camera lens and exaggerated perspective that most games like these tend to have, where everything in the bottom of the screen is enormous and everything in the top is tiny. I'd much rather have a camera that's higher in the sky but with a narrower lens, giving a more isometric feel. And there's really no reason why we can't adjust this ourselves in the options menu.

Combat initiation needs a fix. This is supposed to be a tactical game, so it's complete nonsense that we can't preposition our troops before battle. I'm sure there are many ways to fix this, but here's one: When combat begins, there's first a single round where every character can move only with ~50% action points, and after that the actual shooting begins. If the player party initiates an ambush, only they get to move. If player party is being ambushed, enemies get to move with ~50% AP and player characters get to move with ~30% AP during the prepositioning round.


I kind of agree. But speaking of WL fights as a tactic game: the opponents need to be much harder or at least much more than in WL2 and use more special attacks. Even on SJ I didn't need precision shots and all the other tactical stuff, unless in some boss fights. And I didn't need much medpaks too - I had some 50-stacks in my trunk, never needing them. My rangers really should be wounded more often, even if it is only small wounds - as long as they happen regulary.
Hell is no place, hell is a condition.

crimsoncorporation
Initiate
Posts: 18
Joined: January 26th, 2017, 3:50 pm

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby crimsoncorporation » February 19th, 2017, 5:38 am

Zombra wrote:
crimsoncorporation wrote:
Caerdon wrote:Combat initiation needs a fix. This is supposed to be a tactical game, so it's complete nonsense that we can't preposition our troops before battle.

You can preposition your troops in Wasteland 2, because you can move each Ranger separately. Position to your liking, initiate your first shot, and there you go.

Ehhhhhhhhhh.


Care to elaborate?

Jozape
Scholar
Posts: 174
Joined: March 5th, 2012, 1:50 pm
Location: USA

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby Jozape » February 19th, 2017, 6:20 am

crimsoncorporation wrote:
Caerdon wrote:Combat initiation needs a fix. This is supposed to be a tactical game, so it's complete nonsense that we can't preposition our troops before battle.


You can preposition your troops in Wasteland 2, because you can move each Ranger separately. Position to your liking, initiate your first shot, and there you go.


Almost true if you are initiating combat by issuing an attack command. The problem is in real-time, you have to issue those commands individually and you have to remember to deselect the group if you haven't already -- you can select a single character with the mouse but still have commands issued as a party, which is frustrating -- and hostiles around the map can move around while you struggle in real-time to setup your party. If you are unlucky and combat starts as a result of a hostile seeing you, you have to use precious action points to reposition your characters. Then there is the problem of the combat grid which isn't visible until combat starts. You don't really know exactly where your character will position until combat starts. Cover is not always obvious either, as some things that look like they should be cover are not.

Plus, you can start combat after a dialog choice, which doesn't leave any chance for you to reposition your party. I don't think this should be changed though.

User avatar
Zombra
Global Moderator
Posts: 5438
Joined: March 8th, 2012, 10:50 pm

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby Zombra » February 19th, 2017, 12:36 pm

crimsoncorporation wrote:
Zombra wrote:
crimsoncorporation wrote:You can preposition your troops in Wasteland 2, because you can move each Ranger separately. Position to your liking, initiate your first shot, and there you go.

Ehhhhhhhhhh.

Care to elaborate?

You can do that - sometimes - but the implication that there was nothing wrong with how it worked is silly. I've personally seen dozens of complaints about this, and I've complained about it myself.

In practice, when trying to do what you describe, one of two things happened:
1) You would move your guys close in, one at a time, to the positions you liked. After moving one or two guys to good spots, an enemy would wander a bit too close and combat would begin with half your squad standing flat-footed in the open.
or
2) To avoid this, you would set up your squad far, far away from the enemies, and begin every combat with a sniper shot; then spend (waste) a couple turns getting your close range fighters near enough to participate in the battle.

I suppose it wouldn't be noticeable if you have one of those "all assault rifle, all the time" squads ... but I didn't, and in any case that shouldn't be the only option.

This issue combined with a lack of any kind of formation system made the Rangers look like blundering amateurs, all the time. They're supposed to be a paramilitary group. I should be able to move more than one guy into position at a time.

There have been a lot of solutions brainstormed here and elsewhere. My idea? Wasteland 2 was real-time exploration, turn-based combat. If it were me, I would make Wasteland 3 real-time with pause exploration, turn-based combat. You see the enemy, you pause the game, you issue orders for all Rangers to run to their positions, you unpause, they simultaneously take up positions. Combat starts early if the enemy spots you, but they usually won't because if you pause the game while they are far away they can't wander close while you're moving your guys one by one. So you will have your guys in good positions, reasonably close to the enemy, and can take the first shot at leisure.

Another option - the cheap, decline option - would be to make it so enemies never move out of combat. This way you could position your guys one by one without fear that some dude would stroll nearby and trigger combat prematurely. A band-aid, but I think it would work.
Support multiple squads for single-player in Wasteland 3!
Image
"I don't care about the mass market." Brian Fargo, May 2012
"We want to sell the most units." Brian Fargo, January 2017

Jozape
Scholar
Posts: 174
Joined: March 5th, 2012, 1:50 pm
Location: USA

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby Jozape » February 19th, 2017, 1:21 pm

Zombra wrote:There have been a lot of solutions brainstormed here and elsewhere. My idea? Wasteland 2 was real-time exploration, turn-based combat. If it were me, I would make Wasteland 3 real-time with pause exploration, turn-based combat. You see the enemy, you pause the game, you issue orders for all Rangers to run to their positions, you unpause, they simultaneously take up positions. Combat starts early if the enemy spots you, but they usually won't because if you pause the game while they are far away they can't wander close while you're moving your guys one by one. So you will have your guys in good positions, reasonably close to the enemy, and can take the first shot at leisure.


I've been wishing for Infinity Engine style pause functionality the whole time I've been playing Wasteland 2 and I fully support this idea. Ideally we should be able to pause, move the camera around the map, queue commands, and unpause to see everything gloriously executed. Add auto-pause based on important character observations and we could have the perfect mix of real-time and turn-based role-playing.

This could fix more than just the setup problem; with the auto-pause feature, we can create conditions to pause for mines, alarms, caches, etc. I've been verbally abusive to the computer a few times because my characters spotted 10 mines but ran into all of them because I was sitting back in my chair trying to relax. I've reloaded from 15 minute old saves because of how unfair it felt in a role-playing game to be tested based on my reflexes.

A pause feature would have been nice when dealing with Ralphy for the first time too. That's only an auto-save away, but still.

Another option - the cheap, decline option - would be to make it so enemies never move out of combat. This way you could position your guys one by one without fear that some dude would stroll nearby and trigger combat prematurely. A band-aid, but I think it would work.


Decline indeed. Pausing for 2000.

User avatar
Zombra
Global Moderator
Posts: 5438
Joined: March 8th, 2012, 10:50 pm

Re: Your pet peeves & possible improvements for WL3

Postby Zombra » February 19th, 2017, 2:51 pm

Jozape wrote:I've been wishing for Infinity Engine style pause functionality the whole time I've been playing Wasteland 2 and I fully support this idea.

Now that you mention it, it really would help exploration mode in a lot of other ways too. Thanks for the support.
Support multiple squads for single-player in Wasteland 3!
Image
"I don't care about the mass market." Brian Fargo, May 2012
"We want to sell the most units." Brian Fargo, January 2017


Return to “WL3: General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Woolfe and 1 guest